03 / 06
Vision Product Distribution Pro Platform Launch
So now we have a different problem.

If thousands of people could use the platform...
how do we reach them?

We could advertise. We could build organic traffic. We could create strategic partnerships. Marketplace discovery could eventually bring people in.

And there may be plenty of other channels you want to build.

But my brain naturally went somewhere I already understand pretty well: relationships.

THE PLATFORM Multiple ways to grow
What if one additional way we grow is through people who already know the kinds of Hosts and customers we're trying to reach?
Because I wouldn't be starting from zero.

I already know people who know people.

I've spent years building relationships with marketers, business owners, major leaders, entrepreneurs and people with organizations and audiences of their own.

Some know creators.
Some know coaches and experts.
Some know business owners.
Some lead large organizations.
Some know people with enormous audiences.

That gives us something most new platforms have to spend a lot of time and money trying to create: a potential first wave.

But my relationships alone aren't the big idea.

DUSTIN'S EXISTING RELATIONSHIPS Potential first wave
CREATORS
LEADERS
BUSINESS OWNERS
COACHES
ENTREPRENEURS
ORGANIZATIONS
That's when the question changed.

My network could start the first wave.
But what could create the next one?

I can make introductions. But eventually, I run out of people I personally know.

What interested me was whether the first people we reach could have a reason to keep making valuable introductions themselves.

Not introductions for the sake of introductions.
Introductions that create actual platform business.
Possible Distribution Model
This is the part that got really interesting to me.

The first wave could create the next wave.

DUSTIN'S EXISTING RELATIONSHIPS STARTING POINT
CREATOR CONNECTION
BUSINESS LEADER
COACH CONNECTION
ENTREPRENEUR
ORGANIZATION LEADER
MARKETER
TRAINER
INFLUENCER CONNECTION
What if people who create valuable introductions participate economically when those introductions create real business?

Then the platform isn't asking us to personally acquire every future Host and customer.

We're giving relationships a reason to keep moving.
RELATIONSHIPS
INTRODUCTIONS
HOSTS + CUSTOMERS
REAL PLATFORM USAGE
PLATFORM REVENUE
DISTRIBUTION REWARDS
MORE INTRODUCTIONS
And here's an important part.

You don't have to be the expert. You might just know one.

RELATIONSHIP
MIKE
Mike is not a creator. He knows one.
INTRODUCES
CREATOR
Approximately 2M followers
USES THE PLATFORM
BECOMES A HOST
She can focus entirely on being a Host.
REAL BUSINESS
AUDIENCE BOOKS ACCESS
Real customers create real platform usage.
MIKE DIDN'T CREATE THE CONTENT.
HE CREATED THE CONNECTION.

The Creator does not have to become a Partner. She can simply be a Host.

Real customers create real platform usage. Real platform usage creates platform revenue.

The introduction created real economic value. That's what the proposed distribution model could recognize.

Possible Distribution Model
Which means we don't have to force everyone into the same box.

Customer. Host. Partner. Three different reasons to be here.

CUSTOMER
“I'm here because I want access.”
Connects with Hosts for conversations, knowledge, training, help or access.
CUSTOMER ONLY HOST ONLY PARTNER ONLY CUSTOMER + HOST HOST + PARTNER ALL THREE
These are roles, not requirements.

A creator can simply be a Host. A customer can simply be a customer. A Partner can simply make introductions.

Nobody has to “join the business” just to use the product.
Then I thought about the introduction itself.

Why put a paywall in front of a valuable relationship?

IMAGINE THIS
Someone knows a creator with 5 million followers.
The last thing I'd want to tell that person is:

“Pay us first before you're allowed to refer them.”

That creates friction exactly where we want less of it.

Possible Distribution Model
BECOME A PARTNER · $0
INTRODUCE A REAL HOST OR CUSTOMER
REAL BUSINESS IS CREATED
PARTICIPATE IN APPLICABLE DIRECT BUSINESS YOU CREATED
FREE TO REFER.
PAID SOFTWARE SHOULD STAND ON ITS OWN VALUE.
Working Model
I think the simplest place to start is direct.

If you create the relationship, start with the business you actually created.

Mike is Dustin's personal relationship.

If that relationship creates qualifying platform business, the working model could allow Dustin to participate in the direct economic activity he personally created.

DUSTIN Created the relationship
CREATOR / HOST Generates qualifying paid platform usage
PAID PLATFORM USAGE → PLATFORM REVENUE → POTENTIAL DIRECT DISTRIBUTION REWARD
Easy to understand. Easy to attribute. Tied to actual business.
Potential Structure · Not Final
But relationships don't stop one introduction away.

Sometimes the person who changes the business is someone you've never met.

DUSTIN Knows Mike
MIKE Knows Sarah
SARAH Knows a Creator
CREATOR Becomes a valuable Host
Dustin knows Mike. Let's see where that relationship can lead.
Working Philosophy
But there's an obvious problem we'd have to solve.

Depth shouldn't come from opening accounts. It should come from producing real business.

Otherwise someone could stack inactive accounts between themselves and one valuable Host just to manufacture participation.

ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
WAIT
THAT DOESN'T CREATE VALUE.

Simply opening accounts should not be what creates deeper economic participation.

YOU DON'T BUY DEPTH.
YOU EARN IT THROUGH PRODUCTION.
A free Partner could participate in applicable direct business.

Deeper participation, if we decide to build it, would be unlocked through genuine customer and Host production rather than simply paying a fee or creating accounts.
Exact qualifications, economics and compensation mechanics would need to be modeled and reviewed before launch.
Illustrative
And this is why I think the economics can make sense.

The distribution money can follow real platform business.

$100
Customer Transaction
≈ $80
Host Share
≈ $20
Gross Platform Revenue
PROCESSING OPERATIONS SUPPORT VIDEO / STORAGE REFUNDS / CHARGEBACKS DISTRIBUTION ECONOMICS TAXES / OTHER COSTS
What if a portion of the gross platform revenue helps fund the distribution channel responsible for creating the business?
Customer gets access. Host gets paid. Platform generates revenue. Distribution can potentially participate.

Real commerce funds the model.
Illustrative working example using the same 20% platform-fee assumption from Page 1. Gross platform revenue is not profit and is before processing, refunds, chargebacks, distribution costs, operating expenses, taxes and other costs.
Which changed how I thought about the value of an introduction.

One great Host could be worth discovering.

Illustrative
ONE CREATOR / HOST
$100,000 Monthly Paid-Session GMV
≈ $80,000 Host Share
≈ $20,000 Gross Platform Revenue
One valuable Host can matter. The bigger question is what happens if a relationship-driven channel helps discover many of them.
The point isn't that every Host will produce $100,000 a month.
Most won't.

The point is that discovering the right Hosts can create meaningful economic value for the platform.

And a relationship-driven channel potentially gives us thousands of people helping discover them.
And there's another part of this I really like.

What if some acquisition economics happened after the revenue?

COMPANY SPENDS
AD / TRAFFIC / CLICK
POTENTIAL CUSTOMER
POTENTIAL USAGE
MAYBE REVENUE
Acquisition investment happens before we know the economic outcome.
RELATIONSHIP
INTRODUCTION
HOST OR CUSTOMER
REAL PLATFORM USAGE
REVENUE → POTENTIAL REWARD
Some distribution economics could potentially follow actual business creation.
PAID ACQUISITION
SPEND
TRAFFIC
CUSTOMER?
REVENUE?
PARTNER-DRIVEN
RELATIONSHIP
INTRODUCTION
USAGE
REVENUE → REWARD
This isn't about choosing one.

A strong platform can potentially have paid advertising, direct acquisition, strategic partnerships, marketplace discovery and relationship-driven distribution working at the same time.

Different channels can do different jobs.
So to be really clear about what I'm suggesting...

George, I'm not asking you to change everything you're building.

You may want to grow the platform directly.

You may run paid advertising.

You may build strategic partnerships.

Marketplace discovery may eventually become a major channel.

And there may be other directions you want to pursue that we haven't even talked about.

None of that has to change.

DIRECT PAID ADVERTISING STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS MARKETPLACE OTHER CHANNELS
What I'm interested in is whether we'd be open to testing a Partner-driven distribution channel for the market and relationships I can bring.
GEORGE YOU BUILT THE TECHNOLOGY.

The platform, product foundation and core capability are already there.

+
DUSTIN I'LL BRING A MARKET WE CAN TEST IT IN.

Marketing, relationships, positioning, launch strategy and first-wave reach.

TEST MEASURE LEARN IMPROVE
I'll bring the marketing, relationships and initial reach.

You've already got the technology.

LET'S SEE WHAT THE MARKET TELLS US.

If it works, we'll have something real to build on together.
Which left me with one more practical question.

If we're going to ask people to help put the platform in front of others... what do we put in their hands?

The distribution model only works long term if there's a product people genuinely want, whether they're using it themselves or introducing it to someone else.

Free access can remove friction.

But I also started thinking about what a paid software experience could offer Hosts, Partners and serious users who want more from the platform.

And that's where I think the product model could get really interesting.

04 / 06 · Pro
Scroll to Top